.
Feedback

Revenue Focus of Parking Study

City Council members focused on how developing city-owned parking lots would produce revenue for the Burlingame Downtown Specific Plan.

Creating revenue seemed to be the main concern for city council members during their study session Monday addressing the future use of downtown parking lots under the , which was passed in October.

The members met to discuss potential uses and development of the spaces, how to gather revenue from the lots and how to obtain proposals from developers.

"When you look at our downtown parking lots, what do you envision?" Community Development Director Bill Meeker asked council members.

Many ideas are up for consideration, including more affordable housing for seniors looking to downsize and young people looking for starter homes, mixed-use developments, a boutique hotel and a community center. The council was asked to prioritize these options, though members said they were flexible depending upon the proposals developers offer.

What was clear, however, was the financial importance of the buildings.

"We see a key interest in using these assets to generate some additional revenue," said City Manager, Jim Nantell.

Council members agreed upon the importance of considering what types of buildings—commercial, residential or community-based—make the most sense in which parking lot locations and have previously discussed such options. Additionally, they stressed the importance of creating new parking spots to account for those lost to buildings, most likely through a parking structure.

The location for a parking structure discussed was city lot J between Park Road, Primrose Road, Burlingame Avenue and Howard Avenue. However, the location of a structure here caused disagreement among council members.

"I've always disagreed with that," said Council Member Cathy Baylock. "You want a structure south of Howard just because it's not in the middle of the community."

Other members said a centralized parking structure is necessary, as people will not walk multiple blocks from Burlingame Avenue to their cars.

However, the underlying theme of the meeting was, regardless of what lot gets developed first or what it becomes, revenue for the city is the number one priority.

"We can't do any other bulletpoint unless we have revenue," said Vice Mayor Jerry Deal, referring to Downtown Specific Plan elements such as creating open spaces and streetscapes.

The council agreed that in order to produce revenue, they had to be open to multiple concepts of financing from developers, such as sales, long term leases and partial upfront payments. Only through revenue is the plan for downtown, which is more than four years in the making, viable.

"Downtown development is critical to this city's budget and its quality of life," said Council Member Michael Brownrigg. "Let's get the plan working."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Burlingame-Hillsborough Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Pivirotto April 12, 2013 at 11:33 am
They want your credit card information to process an order that's free. Sorry, that's not going toRead More happen. Call me paranoid, but is that just an oversight or is it their way of tracking their customer's buying habits? I like my privacy, how about you?
Tim Chafee March 30, 2013 at 12:27 pm
Oh yeah! Like I need advise from the Hollywood dung elite like Bill Maher and Danny D'Midget toRead More offer me diet suggestions. If you don't like the product, don't buy it.
E Vorsatz March 18, 2013 at 11:08 pm
Yes, we are well aware of this & can not believe the Burlingame district is proceeding with theRead More plans for this school. The footprint of the school does not allow for safe drop off and pick up. I have seen a couple of different plans for the drop off line & none of them are adequate for the location. The traffic will surely be a nightmare & I hope we are not moved to this school, as there is not proper access for drop off. Also, not sure why the plans keep changing, maybe because they can not come up with a good plan.
Reid Kowallis April 22, 2013 at 07:01 pm
Who will respond to emergencies at Hoover School? I measured the width of the two small bridgesRead More near the bottom of Canyon Road today. One is 17’ 10” and the other is 18’. Emergency response vehicles are 10’ wide, landscape pickup trucks are 8 feet wide and SUVs are 7’ feet wide. Consider what will happen every school day when children are dropped off at school. Traffic will stop on these two bridges and no emergency vehicles will be able to pass. This will happen every school day, twice a day even when there isn’t an emergency. Consider what will happen during any real emergency. The school is located near the San Andreas Fault. Two 30” high pressure gas mains are even closer. The fire department plans to close the fire house on Hillside near the Hoover School. Who will respond to emergencies at Hoover School? How will responders get to the school?
Reid Kowallis April 22, 2013 at 06:34 pm
Has anyone read the safety/disaster plan for Hoover School? The fire department admitted that theyRead More did not take Hoover School into account in the EXPENSIVE consolidation study they commissioned. On April 9th, 2013 I attended a Burlingame City meeting on fire department consolidation . The fire department has paid for a study that recommends closing the fire house on Hillside. They plan to build a new station near Trousdale on Skyline in close proximity to two 30” high pressure gas mains (http://www.pge.com/myhome/edusafety/systemworks/gas/transmissionpipelines/) and within half a mile of the San Andreas Fault.